By: Clifford Krauss
The marching can hardly be called crisp as the new Libyan National Army takes form in daily drills at an abandoned air force base here.
The soldiers do not yet march in step or even keep their formations straight. Some answer their cellphones when they should be taking orders. Some smoke in the middle of exercises. Others push and shove as personal disputes break out over one thing or another.
“You are not going to see a good, really good military,” Gen. Abdul Majid Fakih, an instructor at the military academy under Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi who later defected,

Service members for Libya's transitional government took part in a parade last week that was organized by Tripoli's military council.
said as he supervised the training. “We are just beginning to build.”
Libya has never had a truly professional national army — a cornerstone in the building of a modern state — one that was not the personal tool of a king or dictator and purposely kept weak and divided to avert coups. And the effort at building one by the struggling new interim government may be its most difficult and important task.
Only a respected army will be able to persuade or force the various competing and heavily armed militias around the country to disarm and join together under a unified leadership. The challenge was underscored over the weekend when a militia from the town of Zintan captured Seif al-Islam el-Qaddafi, Colonel Qaddafi’s son and onetime heir apparent, without any help from the army, and then refused to turn him over to the central government.
The army is trying to build respect by holding parades around the country, complete with parachute jumps and fly-bys by Soviet-era MIG fighter jets and Mi-8 helicopters. But even the officers of the new force say they face challenges in building national veneration around the military, as well as in breaking old habits of officer cronyism and allegiance to one strongman or another.
The new army, which numbers a few thousand and includes many soldiers who deserted Colonel Qaddafi’s military, needs barracks, uniforms, vehicles, boots, radios, even flashlights, officers say. Rather than having a central unified command, it is being formed by distinct committees in different cities, following the model of the diverse bunch of militias that fought the war against the dictatorship. And perhaps most troubling, the militias across the country are already refusing to take its orders.
In its first mission just over a week ago, the army sent 100 troops to Al Maya, a village just west of the capital, to separate two fighting militias and retake an old army base that is now a heap of bombed-out buildings and rusting tanks. Its success at negotiating a tentative settlement between the militias after four days of fighting that left at least 13 dead was lauded as a model for the building of a new army that can serve as a unifying force.
But one of the militias, from Zawiyah, has already broken its promise to keep its weapons at home, setting up a roadblock on the main road a couple of miles west of the army base as a sign of resistance. Armed with heavy machine guns atop pickup trucks, the militiamen say they are going nowhere. Meanwhile the army troops are staying at the base, putting a fresh coat of white paint on the outer walls and beginning to clean up the grounds.
“We can’t tell them to surrender their guns,” said Capt. Hakim el-Agouri, the local army commander in Al Maya. He shrugged. “There are people out there who won’t give up their weapons, and if that is the case, there won’t be stability in Libya.”
Diederik Vandewalle, an expert on Libya at Dartmouth College, said it would be difficult for the new army to fulfill “the first requirement of any modern state — to have a monopoly on violence.” He added, “One of the elements you need to instill in your soldiers is a sense of national identity, and that identity has to be on a national level. But the militias have an identity tied to their group or town.”
The army has already become one of several armed forces vying for power, both military and political. Abdel Hakim Belhaj, the army’s leader in Tripoli, told Prime Minister Abdel Rahim el-Keeb in a speech last week that he expected him to keep his promise to include former rebels in cabinet posts as Mr. Keeb was forming his government.
In an interview, Mr. Belhaj, an Islamist who fought against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan but is now critical of Al Qaeda, said the army would give the militia fighters “a choice to join the Ministry of Defense or police, or give up their weapons and return to civilian life.”
He said he was confident the army could accomplish that mission within a couple of months.
“We can’t have an army run by personal agendas,” he added. “The army we need has to be professional and loyal,” with its primary mission being defense of the borders from threats posed by instability in nearby Chad, Mali and Sudan, as well as Qaeda infiltration from Algeria.
Army leaders said their force was mostly training now, but also protecting government buildings and hunting down small groups of former Qaddafi supporters who had not yet surrendered.
They said they planned to build the army methodically. First, committees are being formed in cities around the country to interview militia fighters and decide who should be in the army, who should be in the police, and who is not qualified for either. People with special experience or abilities, like computer skills, will be assigned special tasks.
Militia members without formal military experience outside the rebellion need to be taught proper tactics, and old members of the military need to be retrained, officers said.
“A lot needs to be changed,” said General Fakih, the instructor. “Before the army trained terrorists. That’s over. We need to change the way soldiers treat people, and how officers treat soldiers.”
At the same time, officers say they are preparing to persuade the various militias to give up their heavy machine guns, antiaircraft weapons and rocket launchers, which they say are no longer needed at road checkpoints.
Civilian leaders say they want the militias totally disarmed within the month, but officers say that cannot be done for several more months. General Fakih said the army was preparing “many plans” to disarm the militias if they did not surrender their arms voluntarily, but he would not specify what they were.
Those plans may well be needed.
Down the road from the army base at Al Maya, Ali Dow Mohammed, a Zawiyah militia commander in charge of a heavily fortified checkpoint, said his forces would drop their weapons only when there was a new government, “and there is no government.”
“The Zawiyah council will decide what we do with our arms,” Mr. Mohammed added. “We are here to keep the peace.”
Source: New York Times

Still foreigners don’t get it.
The militias are the revolution. It’s not the militias that need to be disbanded, it’s any government that tries to disband them.The government is there because of the militias , not vice versa. The militias are there to make sure the government represents the will of the people they will not and should not be disbanded until a proper representative government is installed.
Any attempt to disband the militias is counter-revolutionary. and should be regraded with great suspicion. – mostly these are the ideas of foreign interventionists who have alternative agendas for their own foreign interests.
Libya has never had a truly professional national army — a cornerstone in the building of a modern state — …………………..
Therein lies your problem. That’s western thinking. Western insecurity That’s not the thinking of a people that have the opportunity to lead the free world into a new age. It’s totally unworthy of the sacrafices made in the name of freedom. After all has been said and done, the first thing that the transitional government attempts to do is “defang the militias. The militias can protect borders. The dialougue on just and unjust can be pursued through the internet until a government is in place. If the militias could come together to fight the previous cruelty, they can come together to administer the country until fair elections…..This shows an abhorrent lack of priorities, and it isn’t going to work…Who are those people in Government…What’s their backgrounds…What were the previous oil contracts that gaddaffi had…Transparency demands that all that be readily available online. Who copmes to Libya to do business now….Do they in fact represent an inhumane society. I would be dissapointed and befuddled by these ongoing attempts at doing business, political and otherwise , the old way, but I have come to realize that for some there is no other way in the realms of imagination. It’s because they don’t actually know their past that they can’t envision a more worthwhile future, but the world is moving much too fast for them to continue to embrace the present way of doing business. No matter, we’re way the f-uck out ahead of them..What do you think all the guns were for………Summary justice is your enemy. Patience, justice will come, and it won’t take 20 years, or be used as a constant taunt from those that avoid it…As you see, Saif on that mountain is plainly a thorn in the paw of the western predator……..Stay the course……….
Exactly!
The militias ARE the country.It’s insane to “defang the militias” they ensure the freedom of the country – the militias will integrate once the militias have formed a truly representative government.
It will be the militias that create the new democracy not some unelected people who did not create the revolution – they are the ones not to be trusted. They are the ones who want to reap the rewards that others have earned.
Welcome Ankh & James,
hope you read this comment… agree, the militias are the speakers of common people .
“doing business, political and otherwise , the old way, but I have come to realize that for some there is no other way in the realms of imagination”
… well said, that’s the way it alway was. Free Libya, this is your one& only chance to find a new way- inshallah.